<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Linux and Open Source Blog &#187; Standard Battle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://linewbie.com/tag/standard-battle/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://linewbie.com</link>
	<description>News, Reviews, Thoughts and Trends in Linux and Open Source World.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:49:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Will GNOME&#8217;s betrayal lead to Microsoft Victory?</title>
		<link>http://linewbie.com/2007/11/will-gnomes-betrayal-lead-to-microsoft-victory.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=will-gnomes-betrayal-lead-to-microsoft-victory</link>
		<comments>http://linewbie.com/2007/11/will-gnomes-betrayal-lead-to-microsoft-victory.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 01:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linewbie.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[desktop environments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gnome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quotes & thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Document Format]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gnome betrayal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOOOXML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oasis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[odf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OOXML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard Battle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linewbie.com/2007/11/will-gnomes-betrayal-lead-to-microsoft-victory.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoftâ€™s efforts to overturn a vote earlier this year denying its Open XML â€œfast trackâ€ standards certification seem to be getting a boost from the GNOME Foundation.GNOME Foundation founder Miguel deIcaza is a Novell employee, and his actions have been &#8230; <a href="http://linewbie.com/2007/11/will-gnomes-betrayal-lead-to-microsoft-victory.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoftâ€™s efforts to overturn a vote earlier this year denying its Open XML â€œfast trackâ€ standards certification <a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/28/175215">seem to be getting a boost </a>from the GNOME Foundation.GNOME Foundation founder Miguel deIcaza is a Novell employee, and his actions <a href="http://linux.slashdot.org/firehose.pl?id=282891&amp;op=view">have been closely scrutinized </a>since Microsoft signed its controversial â€œpatent licensingâ€ deal with the company <a href="http://www.news.com/Microsoft-makes-Linux-pact-with-Novell/2100-1016_3-6132119.html">a year ago</a>.</p>
<p>OpenXML, also called OOXML, was <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=1382">denied</a> â€œfast trackâ€ International Standards Organization (ISO) approval in September, but a final vote on making it a standard will take place in February, and Microsoft is anxious to get the earlier decision reversed.</p>
<p>To that end Microsoft is working with the <a href="http://www.ecma-international.org/memento/TC45.htm">ECMA TC 45 group </a>to answer detailed questions which accompanied the negative ballots in September, in hopes of changing hearts and minds by February. GNOMEâ€™s <a href="http://synesius.wordpress.com/2007/10/29/gnome-foundation-participates-in-office-open-xml-development/">participation</a> in that group is upsetting Open Document Format (ODF) advocates.</p>
<p>ODF is the format used by Open Office.</p>
<p><a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/28/175215">Opponents</a> of making the Microsoft Word format an ISO document standard, like OpenDocument Fellowship member <a href="http://fanaticattack.com/2007/a-letter-to-the-gnome-foundation.html">Russell Ossendryver</a>, compare GNOMEâ€™s actions to Democrats offering counters to President Bushâ€™s 2005 plan on privatizing Social Security â€” any counter-proposal makes it more likely <a href="http://atrios.blogspot.com/2007_10_21_archive.html#4037066513850445503">something bad will happen</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.linux.com/articles/61057">Dave Neary</a>, a member of the GNOME Foundation and community manager for <a href="http://www.openwengo.com/">OpenWengo</a>, says itâ€™s all <a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2007/10/30/ooxml-gnome-foundation-furore/">safe as milk</a>.  Quoting <a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2007/10/30/ooxml-gnome-foundation-furore/">Jody Goldberg</a>, who calls supporting ODF â€œ<a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/jody/2007/09/10/odf-vs-oox-asking-the-wrong-questions/">significantly more difficult</a>â€ than supporting OOXML, he suggests ODF will never be the â€œone true formatâ€ without destroying its utility.</p>
<p>In arguing for Open XML on his blog yesterday, Jason Matusow of Microsoft insists <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2007/10/30/document-formats-discussions.aspx">no oneâ€™s hands are clean</a>, that any decision gives proprietary advantage to someone, and the place to fight all this out is the marketplace, not a standards-setting process.</p>
<p>The issue is vital for this reason. Microsoft Office has a dominant market share. Microsoft Office is proprietary. Microsoftâ€™s XML formatting was <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=959">changed just before Office 2007â€™s final release</a>, destroying interoperabiity with ODF until fixes could be found.</p>
<p>Once a proprietary standard is approved by the ISO, and made a standard, its eventual replacement by a truly open standard like ODF becomes impossible. At best the two stand side-by-side, and Microsoftâ€™s market dominance is baked into the market.</p>
<p>Thatâ€™s why, despite the fact OOXML or OpenXML may be a better format today, groups like <a href="http://www.noooxml.org/">NOOOXML</a> are fighting so hard against ISO approval. (The cartoon is from the NOOOXML site.)</p>
<p>Once a proprietary format becomes a standard, the era of truly open standards is over, and the way becomes clear to making anything proprietary.</p>
<p>- by ZDNET</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://linewbie.com/2007/11/will-gnomes-betrayal-lead-to-microsoft-victory.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

